Archive for March 14th, 2011
It’s not easy to add to a legendary set of tales like Alexandre Dumas’s stories about the Musketeers, but Sarah d’Almeida has done an admirable job in writing a new tale in that mythos with DEATH OF A MUSKETEER. d’Almeida (a nom de plume for novelist Sarah A. Hoyt) found a way to add stories by the expedient of “finding” a “previously unexplored manuscript” that purports to be in the various hands of the four Musketeers (being D’Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos respectively). DEATH OF A MUSKETEER starts out with D’Artagnan, who’s recently come to Paris to start his career. His father gave him a note commending him to the Musketeers, but it’s been stolen before he meets up with Athos and the others along the road. D’Artagnan was told by his father that he should “fight as often as possible,” which is partly why he starts out by fighting Athos . . . that someone else breaks in on their duel and D’Artagnan must join forces with the three Musketeers or die helps them jell very quickly as compatriots and friends. (The obligatory drunken revel afterward only cements it further.)
But then, the four find the corpse of what appears to be a dead Musketeer — how could this have happened? And what, exactly, led to this remarkable event in the first place?
(Of course, if I told you all of that, that would blow the plotline something fierce, so I’ll stop there with a plot summary.)
Ms. d’Almeida captures the time, look, and ethos of France at the time of King Louis and Cardinal Richelieu effortlessly while adding greatly to the female characters that Dumas seemed to give short shrift; in particular, Porthos’ paramour Athenais is better-rounded and not played for laughs (as Dumas tended to do), instead being a woman of substance who’s unfortunately married to a man much her senior in years with few legal rights and many responsibilities.
Among the Musketeers, Athos’s plight is well-realized, while Aramis and Porthos become real men in three-dimensional life, while D’Artagnan’s youthful naïveté is shown in order to broaden and deepen him as a real, live human being (rather than “merely” an epic hero as Dumas played him). All of them become better friends while investigating the murder of the dead Musketeer, which of course makes perfect sense from a narrative background and is highly satisfying, besides. I appreciated all of these additions and believed they added greatly to the characterization of the Musketeers and their loved ones. This additional depth helps the story immeasurably without getting once in the way of the action — a neat trick, one which Ms. d’Almeida pulls off with great aplomb.
DEATH OF A MUSKETEER is a fast, fun, and furious tale that adds color and depth to Dumas’s best-known protagonists, especially with regards to the Musketeers’ romantic partners, and the added complexity is greatly welcome. I enjoyed this fine novel thoroughly and believe if you enjoy mysteries, sword fighting or most especially the tales of Alexandre Dumas and medieval/Renaissance France, you will love DEATH OF A MUSKETEER as much as I did.
–Reviewed by Barb
James K. Galbraith’s THE PREDATOR STATE: HOW CONSERVATIVES ABANDONED THE FREE MARKET AND WHY LIBERALS SHOULD TOO is a revealing look at contemporary politics through the lens of a noted economist. Galbraith’s main contention is that government, rather than easing the way of those it governs, has become a severe impediment instead due to the way it deals with the economy (or doesn’t). The politicians who’ve “given over” many of their duties to lobbyists also are excoriated by Galbraith at great length and detail, which is the main reason Galbraith considers our current system to be one of predation rather than actually being a helpful, consistent government.
Galbraith explains the problem on page 147:
Predation is the enemy of honest and independent and especially of sustainable business, of businesses that simply want to sell to the public and make a decent living over the long run. In a world where the winners are all connected, it is not only the prey (who by and large carry little political weight) who lose out. It is everyone who has not licked the appropriate boots.“
Galbraith’s strongest points are about lobbying, and lobbyists, and in specific are about the government of George W. Bush and how many things that had previously been highly regulated became unregulated due to the influx of corporate privilege and corporate lobbyists who became part of the government in order to subvert it. Those who would rather profit from the government than doing the hard work of governance are the ones Galbraith has the least use for, and it shows.
But mostly, Galbraith talks about standards and why we need them, and how running deficits (whether trade or monetary) isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
Now, is THE PREDATOR STATE an interesting, complex, multi-faceted and multifarious work of non-fiction? Absolutely. But some of it is designed to make you upset, especially considering the main theme of the book is that too many predators have eased their way into government in order to make money in the short run, the long run be hanged. (We’ve seen that recently in the 2007-8 stock market collapse, where the Wall Street bigwigs made out like bandits while everyone else suffered.)
As Galbraith puts it, again from page 147:
In the corporate republic that presides over the Predator State, nothing is done for the common good. Indeed, the men in charge do not recognize that public purposes exist. For this reason, the concept of competence has no relevance: to be incompetent, you must at least be trying. But the men in charge are not trying: they have friends, and enemies, and as for the rest — we are prey.“
These words are incendiary, and are meant to be; I quote them to give you fair warning that at least some of this book will make you boiling mad (perhaps not the same parts for everyone, as Galbraith insults most facets of the political economy equally).
That being said, I’d recommend THE PREDATOR STATE as a blistering exposé of what’s wrong with politics, and most importantly, what’s wrong with our economy on the conceptual level to anyone who’s looking for answers as to why, exactly, our current system seems to have failed us so abysmally.
— Reviewed by Barb